Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Emergency Physician Stress and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Tool

Received: 13 October 2025     Accepted: 23 October 2025     Published: 28 November 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Background: Emergency physicians (EPs) work in unpredictable, high-pressure environments that demand rapid clinical decisions and constant multitasking. Such conditions expose them to significant occupational stress, which, if persistent or unmanaged, can impair judgment, reduce job satisfaction, and increase the likelihood of burnout. Understanding and accurately measuring this stress is essential to improving physician well-being and patient safety. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a multidimensional tool to assess stress among emergency physicians and to explore its relationship with key patient-related outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sudan from February to July 2025. A structured, self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to practicing emergency physicians across multiple hospitals. The tool underwent content and construct validation, with exploratory factor analysis used to identify underlying stress domains. Logistic regression was applied to examine associations between overall stress levels and self-reported clinical outcomes, including medical errors and turnover intention. Results: A total of 202 emergency physicians completed the survey. Four primary stress domains were identified: burnout, workload, psychological distress, and system-related stress. Higher composite stress scores were significantly correlated with increased reports of medical errors (p < 0.01) and a greater intention to leave their current position (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The developed instrument demonstrated strong validity and reliability in assessing multiple aspects of emergency physician stress. Findings highlight that elevated stress levels adversely affect both clinicians and patients. Implementing structured support systems, promoting coping strategies, and enhancing workplace resilience are essential to reduce stress and improve emergency care quality.

Published in American Journal of Health Research (Volume 13, Issue 6)
DOI 10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13
Page(s) 308-314
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Emergency Medicine, Physician Stress, Burnout, Patient Outcomes, Coping Strategies, Resilience

References
[1] Maslach C, Jackson SE, Leiter MP. Maslach Burnout Inventory Manual. 3rd ed. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press; 1996.
[2] Cohen S, Kamarck T, Mermelstein R. A global measure of perceived stress. J Health Soc Behav. 1983; 24(4): 385–396.
[3] Shanafelt TD, Boone S, Tan L, et al. Burnout and satisfaction with work-life balance among US physicians. Arch Intern Med. 2012; 172(18): 1377–1385.
[4] Dyrbye LN, Shanafelt TD. Physician burnout: a potential threat to successful health care reform. JAMA. 2011; 305(19): 2009–2010.
[5] Wosny M, Strasser LM, Hastings J. Experience of Health Care Professionals Using Digital Tools in the Hospital: Qualitative Systematic Review. JMIR Hum Factors. 2023; 10: e50357.
[6] Appiani FJ, Rodríguez Cairoli F, Sarotto L, et al. Prevalence of stress, burnout syndrome, anxiety and depression among physicians of a teaching hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic. Arch Argent Pediatr. 2021; 119(5): 317–324.
[7] Watson AG, Saggar V, MacDowell C, McCoy JV. Self-reported modifying effects of resilience factors on perceptions of workload, patient outcomes, and burnout in physician-attendees. Psychol Health Med. 2019; 24(10): 1220–1234.
[8] Li Z, Wu M, Zhang X, et al. Interrelationships of stress, burnout, anxiety, depression, quality of life and suicidality among Chinese residents under Standardized Residency Training: a network analysis. Ann Med. 2024; 56(1): 2433030.
[9] Solmi M, Estradé A, Thompson T, et al. The collaborative outcomes study on health and functioning during infection times in adults (COH-FIT-Adults): Design and methods of an international online survey targeting physical and mental health effects of the COVID-19 pandemic. J Affect Disord. 2022; 299: 393–407.
[10] Bernburg M, Tell A, Groneberg DA, Mache S. Digital stressors and resources perceived by emergency physicians and associations to their digital stress perception, mental health, job satisfaction and work engagement. BMC Emerg Med. 2024; 24(1): 31.
[11] Lindner M, Leutritz T, Backhaus J, et al. Knowledge Gain and the Impact of Stress in a Fully Immersive Virtual Reality-Based Medical Emergencies Training With Automated Feedback: Randomized Controlled Trial. J Med Internet Res. 2025; 27: e67412.
[12] Lynch J, Prihodova L, Dunne PJ, et al. Mantra meditation programme for emergency department staff: a qualitative study. BMJ Open. 2018; 8(9): e020685.
[13] Mathura P, Pascheto I, Ringrose J, Ramsay G. What about physician wellness? Impact of a quality improvement intervention. BMJ Open Qual. 2025; 14(1): e003078.
[14] Hu YY, Fix ML, Hevelone ND, et al. Physicians' needs in coping with emotional stressors: the case for peer support. Arch Surg. 2012; 147(3): 212–217.
[15] Truchot J, Michelet D, Philippon AL, et al. Effect of a specific training intervention with task interruptions on the quality of simulated advanced life support: A randomized multicenter controlled simulation study. Australas Emerg Care. 2023; 26(2): 153–157.
[16] Bjørshol CA, Myklebust H, Nilsen KL, et al. Effect of socioemotional stress on the quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation during advanced life support in a randomized manikin study. Crit Care Med. 2011; 39(2): 300–304.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Mohamed, O. F. O., Abdalla, M. A. M., Yassin, E. S. E., Mohammed, E. H. A., Ahmed, A. A. S. M., et al. (2025). Emergency Physician Stress and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Tool. American Journal of Health Research, 13(6), 308-314. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Mohamed, O. F. O.; Abdalla, M. A. M.; Yassin, E. S. E.; Mohammed, E. H. A.; Ahmed, A. A. S. M., et al. Emergency Physician Stress and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Tool. Am. J. Health Res. 2025, 13(6), 308-314. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Mohamed OFO, Abdalla MAM, Yassin ESE, Mohammed EHA, Ahmed AASM, et al. Emergency Physician Stress and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Tool. Am J Health Res. 2025;13(6):308-314. doi: 10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13,
      author = {Omer Faiz Omer Mohamed and Mohamed Abbas Mudawi Abdalla and Elfadil Shaaeldin Elfadil Yassin and Elaf Hatim Akasha Mohammed and Ahmed Altayeb Salih Mohamed Ahmed and Yusra Raafat Mustafa Abdalmagid and Elbagir Abuelgasim Elbagir Mustafa},
      title = {Emergency Physician Stress and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Tool},
      journal = {American Journal of Health Research},
      volume = {13},
      number = {6},
      pages = {308-314},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ajhr.20251306.13},
      abstract = {Background: Emergency physicians (EPs) work in unpredictable, high-pressure environments that demand rapid clinical decisions and constant multitasking. Such conditions expose them to significant occupational stress, which, if persistent or unmanaged, can impair judgment, reduce job satisfaction, and increase the likelihood of burnout. Understanding and accurately measuring this stress is essential to improving physician well-being and patient safety. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a multidimensional tool to assess stress among emergency physicians and to explore its relationship with key patient-related outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sudan from February to July 2025. A structured, self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to practicing emergency physicians across multiple hospitals. The tool underwent content and construct validation, with exploratory factor analysis used to identify underlying stress domains. Logistic regression was applied to examine associations between overall stress levels and self-reported clinical outcomes, including medical errors and turnover intention. Results: A total of 202 emergency physicians completed the survey. Four primary stress domains were identified: burnout, workload, psychological distress, and system-related stress. Higher composite stress scores were significantly correlated with increased reports of medical errors (p Conclusion: The developed instrument demonstrated strong validity and reliability in assessing multiple aspects of emergency physician stress. Findings highlight that elevated stress levels adversely affect both clinicians and patients. Implementing structured support systems, promoting coping strategies, and enhancing workplace resilience are essential to reduce stress and improve emergency care quality.},
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Emergency Physician Stress and Its Impact on Patient Outcomes: Development and Validation of a Multidimensional Assessment Tool
    AU  - Omer Faiz Omer Mohamed
    AU  - Mohamed Abbas Mudawi Abdalla
    AU  - Elfadil Shaaeldin Elfadil Yassin
    AU  - Elaf Hatim Akasha Mohammed
    AU  - Ahmed Altayeb Salih Mohamed Ahmed
    AU  - Yusra Raafat Mustafa Abdalmagid
    AU  - Elbagir Abuelgasim Elbagir Mustafa
    Y1  - 2025/11/28
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13
    T2  - American Journal of Health Research
    JF  - American Journal of Health Research
    JO  - American Journal of Health Research
    SP  - 308
    EP  - 314
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2330-8796
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ajhr.20251306.13
    AB  - Background: Emergency physicians (EPs) work in unpredictable, high-pressure environments that demand rapid clinical decisions and constant multitasking. Such conditions expose them to significant occupational stress, which, if persistent or unmanaged, can impair judgment, reduce job satisfaction, and increase the likelihood of burnout. Understanding and accurately measuring this stress is essential to improving physician well-being and patient safety. Objective: This study aimed to develop and validate a multidimensional tool to assess stress among emergency physicians and to explore its relationship with key patient-related outcomes. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in Sudan from February to July 2025. A structured, self-administered online questionnaire was distributed to practicing emergency physicians across multiple hospitals. The tool underwent content and construct validation, with exploratory factor analysis used to identify underlying stress domains. Logistic regression was applied to examine associations between overall stress levels and self-reported clinical outcomes, including medical errors and turnover intention. Results: A total of 202 emergency physicians completed the survey. Four primary stress domains were identified: burnout, workload, psychological distress, and system-related stress. Higher composite stress scores were significantly correlated with increased reports of medical errors (p Conclusion: The developed instrument demonstrated strong validity and reliability in assessing multiple aspects of emergency physician stress. Findings highlight that elevated stress levels adversely affect both clinicians and patients. Implementing structured support systems, promoting coping strategies, and enhancing workplace resilience are essential to reduce stress and improve emergency care quality.
    VL  - 13
    IS  - 6
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections