It is a widely accepted fact that the quiet-time equatorial electrojet (EEJ) is a prominent narrow band of enhanced daytime eastward current flowing basically in the ionospheric E-region within ± 3° latitude of the dip equator. Studies have shown over the years that at least two magnetic stations are required to estimate the daytime variability strength of the EEJ. One station must be situated within the EEJ strip (station whose EEJ strength is to be determined) and the other displaced just outside the EEJ influence. One of the open issues in estimating the strength of the EEJ has been the actual latitudinal distance of the off-equatorial station from the equatorial region. This has given rise to different schools of thought in estimating the variability strength of the EEJ. This paper outlined for the first time the latitudinal extent required of the off-equatorial station which is longitudinally aligned with the equatorial station and step-by-step procedure required for estimating the daytime equatorial electrojet and the latitudinal extent ideal for choosing the off-equatorial station aligned to the equatorial station. The result from this study will clarify on the latitudinal extent required for estimating the variability strength of the EEJ in the African sector and invariably provide to some extent the role of equatorial electrojet on the distribution of equatorial ionization at low latitude in this region.
| Published in | Earth Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11 |
| Page(s) | 215-224 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Ionosphere, Atmosphere, Equatorial Electrojet, Geomagnetic Field, Solar Quiet (Sq) Current
| [1] | Yamazaki, Y., Yumoto, K., Yoshikawa, A., Watari, S., & Utada, H. (2009). Characteristics of counter-Sq SFE (SFE*) at the dip equator CPMN stations. Journal of Geophysical Research, 114, A05306. |
| [2] | Pedatella, N. M., Forbes, J. M., & Richmond, A. D. (2011). Seasonal and longitudinal variations of the solar quiet (Sq) current system during solar minimum determined by CHAMP satellite magnetic field observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 116(A4). |
| [3] | Egedal, J. (1948). Daily variation of the horizontal magnetic force at the magnetic equator. Nature, 161, 443–444. |
| [4] | Chapman, S. (1951). The equatorial electrojet as detected from the abnormal electric current distribution above Huancayo, Peru, and elsewhere. Archiv Fuer Meteorologie, Geophysik und Bioklimatologie, Serie A, 4(1), 368-390. |
| [5] | Okeke F. N and Hamano Y. (2000). New features of abnormal quiet days in equatorial regions. IJGA 2(2): 109-114. |
| [6] | Onwumechilli, C. A. (1997). The Equatorial Electrojet, vol. 627. Gordon & Breach, Netherlands. |
| [7] | Rastogi, R. G. (1975). On the simultaneous existence of eastward and westward -owing electrojet current, Proc. Ind. Acad. Sci., 81, 80±92, 1975. |
| [8] | Abbas, M., Joshua, B., Bonde, D., Adimula, I. A., Rabiu, A. B., Bello, O. R. (2012). Variability of electrojet strength along the magnetic equator using MAGDAS/CPMN data. J. Inform. Data Manage. 1(1), 10–13. |
| [9] | Abbas M, Abidin, Z. Z, Jusoh M. H, Bolaji, O. S, and Yoshikawa A. (2019). Feature of the horizontal magnetic field intensity over northern island of Malaysia. Ind. J. Phys. 93(10), 1247-1257. |
| [10] | Anderson, D. N., Anghel, A., Yumoto, K., Ishitsuka, M., and Kudeki, E. (2002). Estimating daytime vertical ExB drift velocities in the equatorial F region using ground-based magnetometer observations. GRL 29(12), |
| [11] | Anderson, D., A. Anghel, J. Chau, and O. Veliz. (2004). Daytime vertical ExB drift velocities inferred from ground based magnetometer observations at low latitudes, Space Weather, 2, S11001, |
| [12] | Venkatesh, K., Fagundes, P. R., Prasad, D. S. V. V. D., Denardini, C. M., de Abreu, A. J., de Jesus, R., & Gende M. (2015). Day-to-day variability of equatorial electrojet and its role on the day-to-day characteristics of the equatorial ionization anomaly over the Indian and Brazilian sectors. Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics, 120(10), 9117-9131. |
| [13] | Alex S, Kadam BD, Rao DRK (1998) Ionospheric current systems on days of low equatorial ΔH. J Atmos Solar Terr Phys 60: 371–379. |
| [14] | Vichare G, and Rajaram R (2011) Global features of quiet time counter electrojet observed by Ørsted. J Geophys Res 116: A04306. |
| [15] | Vineeth, C., Pant, T. K., Kumar, K. K., Jose, L., Sumod, S. G., & Alex, S. (2012). Counter equatorial electrojet: Analysis of the variability in daytime mesopause temperature and winds. Journal of atmospheric and solar-terrestrial physics, 75, 115-121. |
| [16] | Muhammed, K. P. V and Gurubaran, S. (2018). Equatorial counter electrojets in the noon time: a comparison with the events at other local times. International Journal of Advanced Scientific Research and Management, Volume 3 Issue 11, ISSN 2455-6378. |
| [17] | Chandrasekhar N. P, Archana R. K, Nagarajan N, Arora K (2017). Variability of Equatorial counter electrojet signatures in the Indian region. J Geophys Res. |
| [18] | Siddiqui, T. A., C. Stolle, H. Lühr, and J. Matzka (2015), On therelationship between weakeningof the northern polar vortex andthe lunar tidal amplificationin the equatorial electrojet, J. Geophys. Res. SpacePhysics, 120, 10,006–10,019, |
| [19] | Adebesin B. O., Adeniyi, J. O., Adimula, I. A., Reinisch, B. W. and Yumoto, K. (2013). F2 layer characteristics and electrojet strength over an equatorial station. Adv. Space Res. 52 791–800. |
| [20] | Abbas M and Salihu M. (2014). Variability Strength of the Equatorial Electrojet Over Africa during Low Solar Activity. Intern. Journ. Marine, Atmos. & Earth Sciences, vol. 2(1) 28-40, ISSN: 2327-3356 Florida, USA. |
| [21] | Cherkos A. M. & Nigussie M. (2022). A study of spatio-temporal variabi lity of equatorial electrojet using long-term ground-observations. Adv. Space Res. 69, 869–888. |
| [22] | Rastogi R. G. 1973. Counter equatorial electrojet currents in the Indian zone. Planet. Space Sci., 21, 1355-1365. |
| [23] | Bolaji, O. S., I. A. Adimula, J. O. Adeniyi, and K. Yumoto (2013)- Variability of horizontal magnetic field intensity over Nigeria during low solar activity, Earth Moon Planets, 110, 91–103, |
| [24] | Rastogi, R. G., (1998). Disturbance daily variation of equatorial electrojet current. Current Science 74, 457±460. |
| [25] | Opgenoorth, H. J., Robinson, R., Ngwira, C. M., Garcia Sage, K., Kuznetsova, M., El-Alaoui, et al.,(2013). Earth’s geomagnetic environment-progress and gaps in understanding, prediction, and impacts, Adv. Space Res., in press. Available online 14 May 2024. |
| [26] | Rabiu, A. B., Adimula, I. A., Yumoto, K., Adeniyi, J. O., Maeda, G., & MAGDAS/CPMN Project group. (2009). Preliminary results from the magnetic field measurements using MAGDAS at Ilorin, Nigeria. Earth, Moon, and Planets, 104, 173-179. |
| [27] | Olsen, N., de Geeter, C., Alken, P. and Qamili, E., (2025). A climatological model of the Equatorial Electrojet based on Swarm satellite magnetic intensity observations. Journal of Space Weather and Space Climate. |
| [28] | Haerendel, G., Eccles, J. V., 1992. The role of the equatorial electrojet in the evening ionosphere. Journal of Geophysical Research 97, 1181–1197. |
APA Style
Abbas, M., Kaoje, M. B., Mohammad, M., Furfuri, M. I., Koko, A. Y., et al. (2025). Features of Quiet-time Magnetic Field and Simple Approach to Estimate the Variability Strength of Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) Current Intensity. Earth Sciences, 14(6), 215-224. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11
ACS Style
Abbas, M.; Kaoje, M. B.; Mohammad, M.; Furfuri, M. I.; Koko, A. Y., et al. Features of Quiet-time Magnetic Field and Simple Approach to Estimate the Variability Strength of Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) Current Intensity. Earth Sci. 2025, 14(6), 215-224. doi: 10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11
@article{10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11,
author = {Mustapha Abbas and Mohammed Bello Kaoje and Mukhtar Mohammad and Mukhtar Ibrahim Furfuri and Arzika Yusuf Koko and Aminu Muhammad and Asabe Audu Ibrahim},
title = {Features of Quiet-time Magnetic Field and Simple Approach to Estimate the Variability Strength of Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) Current Intensity
},
journal = {Earth Sciences},
volume = {14},
number = {6},
pages = {215-224},
doi = {10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.earth.20251406.11},
abstract = {It is a widely accepted fact that the quiet-time equatorial electrojet (EEJ) is a prominent narrow band of enhanced daytime eastward current flowing basically in the ionospheric E-region within ± 3° latitude of the dip equator. Studies have shown over the years that at least two magnetic stations are required to estimate the daytime variability strength of the EEJ. One station must be situated within the EEJ strip (station whose EEJ strength is to be determined) and the other displaced just outside the EEJ influence. One of the open issues in estimating the strength of the EEJ has been the actual latitudinal distance of the off-equatorial station from the equatorial region. This has given rise to different schools of thought in estimating the variability strength of the EEJ. This paper outlined for the first time the latitudinal extent required of the off-equatorial station which is longitudinally aligned with the equatorial station and step-by-step procedure required for estimating the daytime equatorial electrojet and the latitudinal extent ideal for choosing the off-equatorial station aligned to the equatorial station. The result from this study will clarify on the latitudinal extent required for estimating the variability strength of the EEJ in the African sector and invariably provide to some extent the role of equatorial electrojet on the distribution of equatorial ionization at low latitude in this region.},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Features of Quiet-time Magnetic Field and Simple Approach to Estimate the Variability Strength of Equatorial Electrojet (EEJ) Current Intensity AU - Mustapha Abbas AU - Mohammed Bello Kaoje AU - Mukhtar Mohammad AU - Mukhtar Ibrahim Furfuri AU - Arzika Yusuf Koko AU - Aminu Muhammad AU - Asabe Audu Ibrahim Y1 - 2025/11/28 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11 DO - 10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11 T2 - Earth Sciences JF - Earth Sciences JO - Earth Sciences SP - 215 EP - 224 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2328-5982 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.earth.20251406.11 AB - It is a widely accepted fact that the quiet-time equatorial electrojet (EEJ) is a prominent narrow band of enhanced daytime eastward current flowing basically in the ionospheric E-region within ± 3° latitude of the dip equator. Studies have shown over the years that at least two magnetic stations are required to estimate the daytime variability strength of the EEJ. One station must be situated within the EEJ strip (station whose EEJ strength is to be determined) and the other displaced just outside the EEJ influence. One of the open issues in estimating the strength of the EEJ has been the actual latitudinal distance of the off-equatorial station from the equatorial region. This has given rise to different schools of thought in estimating the variability strength of the EEJ. This paper outlined for the first time the latitudinal extent required of the off-equatorial station which is longitudinally aligned with the equatorial station and step-by-step procedure required for estimating the daytime equatorial electrojet and the latitudinal extent ideal for choosing the off-equatorial station aligned to the equatorial station. The result from this study will clarify on the latitudinal extent required for estimating the variability strength of the EEJ in the African sector and invariably provide to some extent the role of equatorial electrojet on the distribution of equatorial ionization at low latitude in this region. VL - 14 IS - 6 ER -