Soybeans are widely cultivated in East Gonja, yet their household use remains uneven despite clear nutritional and livelihood benefits. This study assessed household consumption patterns, awareness and perceptions, and constraints shaping soybean utilization to inform targeted nutrition and livelihood interventions in the municipality. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was applied to a sample of 384 households selected through multi-stage cluster sampling. Quantitative data were collected via structured questionnaires and analysed in the Statical package for the social sciences (SPSS) (descriptive statistics, χ² tests, and binary logistic regression). Qualitative data from focus group discussions and key informant interviews were thematically analysed in NVivo to contextualize quantitative findings. Household utilization was high overall (289/384, 75.26%). Most users reported 1–2 uses in the prior 7 days (48.96%), with the majority indicating year-round use (58.85%). Typical monthly use clustered at 1–2kg (39.32%). Mothers were most often responsible for soybean meal preparation (94.46%), and local markets were the primary source (61.25%). Awareness of processing methods was high (87.50%); just over half had received preparation information (52.86%); nearly all believed recipe access would increase use (97.92%); and two-thirds reported household-level processing (67.71%). Bivariate analyses showed significant associations between utilization and sex, education, household size, and income (all p ≤.019), and between utilization and cultural acceptance, attitudes, awareness of processing, reported challenges, and belief that recipes would increase use (all p ≤.013). In the multivariable model (LR χ² = 182.688, p <.001; pseudo-R² = 0.737; n = 380), neutral attitude predicted markedly lower odds of utilization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.018, p <.001), while awareness of processing methods predicted higher odds (AOR = 3.338, p =.016). Sex, education, household size, and reported challenges were not significant after adjustment. Soybean consumption is common in East Gonja but is shaped by attitudes and know-how. Neutral dispositions toward soybean meals constrain use, whereas awareness of processing methods enables adoption. Routine preparation roles held by mothers and reliance on local markets frame day-to-day use. These findings point to practical levers for improving household nutrition through soy.
| Published in | International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences (Volume 14, Issue 6) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17 |
| Page(s) | 428-440 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Soya Bean, Utilization, Consumption Pattern, Perception and Constrain
| [1] | FAO. (2018). The state of food security and nutrition in the world 2018. Food and Agriculture Organization. |
| [2] | Shurtleff, W., & Aoyagi, A. (2016). History of soybeans and soyfoods in Africa (1857–2009). Soyinfo Center. |
| [3] | Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). (2019). Ghana living standards survey (Round 7): Main report. Accra: GSS. |
| [4] | Amoah, S., Danso-Abbeam, G., &Ehiakpor, D. (2020). Adoption and impact of soybean innovations in northern Ghana. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 15(4), 512–523. |
| [5] | Messina, M., Rogero, M. M., Fisberg, M., &Waitzberg, D. (2022). Health impact of soy consumption. Nutrients, 14(4), 798. |
| [6] | Rebello, C. J., Greenway, F. L., & Finley, J. W. (2014). Whole soy and soy isoflavones: Mechanisms and insights for public health. Nutrition Reviews, 72(2), 127–136. |
| [7] | Singh, P., Kumar, R., & Sabharwal, S. (2018). Nutritional aspects of soy protein. Food Reviews International, 34(4), 331–351. |
| [8] | Young, V. R., & Scrimshaw, N. S. (1979). Soy protein in human nutrition: An overview. The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, 32(2), 315–331. |
| [9] | Duan, Y., Li, Z., & Wang, Y. (2022). Soy protein as a cost-effective dietary alternative. Nutrition Reviews, 80(1), 89–101. |
| [10] | Aidoo, R., & Fromm, I. (2015). Willingness to adopt soybeans in Ghana. International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics, 3(1), 55–68. |
| [11] | Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA). (2020). Agriculture in Ghana: Facts and figures. Accra: MoFA. |
| [12] | Hamza, A., Yusuf, M., & Osman, S. (2024). Soybeans for economic sustainability in rural Africa. African Journal of Rural Development, 15(1), 101–117. |
| [13] | FAO. (2019). Nutrition-sensitive agriculture and food systems in practice. Food and Agriculture Organization. |
| [14] | Gibson, R. S., Ferguson, E. L., &Lehrfeld, J. (2020). Nutrition interventions with soy-based foods in low-income settings. Public Health Nutrition, 23(4), 555–567. |
| [15] | Messina, M. (2016). Soy and health update: Evaluation of the clinical and epidemiologic literature. Nutrients, 8(12), 754. |
| [16] | FAO. (2020). Soybean production and utilization trends in Africa. Food and Agriculture Organization. |
| [17] | Frempong, R., &Annim, S. (2017). Soybean utilization in Ghana: A household analysis. African Journal of Agricultural Economics, 12(3), 233–245. |
| [18] | MoFA. (2020). Ministry of Food and Agriculture. Annual report 2019. Ministry of Food and Agriculture (MoFA). Accra. |
| [19] | GAIN. (2019). Soybean utilization in Ghana school feeding programs. Global Alliance for Improved Nutrition. |
| [20] | Bosu, E. (2015). Socio-cultural barriers to soybean consumption in Ghana. Ghana Journal of Nutrition, 4(2), 23–31. |
| [21] | Zakariah-Akoto, S., Boateng, L., &Nartey, A. (2024). Socio-cultural perceptions of soy utilization in Ghana. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 13(1), 25–34. |
| [22] | Asodina, F., Appiah, S., &Konadu, D. (2021). Improving sensory qualities of soybean-based foods through roasting. Food Science & Nutrition, 9(7), 3762–3771. |
| [23] | Oldewage-Theron, W., Egal, A., & Napier, C. (2019). The sensory quality and acceptability of soy-based foods in low-income communities. Food Quality and Preference, 71, 87–95. |
| [24] | Sanful, R., &Darko, S. (2010). Sensory and nutritional evaluation of soy-based weaning foods. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 47(4), 400–405. |
| [25] | Azulirah, M. (2020). Misconceptions about soy and human health: A review. Journal of Nutrition and Health, 12(2), 44–52. |
| [26] | Sasi, R., Kumar, N., & Patel, R. (2023). Debunking myths about soy consumption. Journal of Human Nutrition, 36(1), 18–27. |
| [27] | Muleta, T. (2022). Gender and household food choices in sub-Saharan Africa. Gender & Development, 30(1-2), 55–72. |
| [28] | Chivasa, W., Moyo, T., &Ncube, N. (2022). Seasonal availability of soybeans and household nutrition in rural Africa. Journal of Rural Studies, 89, 93–102. |
| [29] | Kaba, J., &Emana, B. (2024). Value chains and constraints in soybean marketing. African Agribusiness Journal, 8(2), 66–77. |
| [30] | Addae-Frimpomaah, F., Amenorpe, G., Denwar, N. N., Amiteye, S., Adazebra, G. A., Sossah, F. L., Akaba, S., Issah, A. R., & Amoatey, H. M. (2022). Participatory approach of preferred traits, production constraints and mitigation strategies: Implications for soybean breeding in Guinea Savannah zone of Ghana. Heliyon, 8(5), e09497. |
| [31] | Afriyie, E., Gatzweiler, F., Zurek, M., Asem, F. E., Ahiakpa, J. K., Okpattah, B., Aidoo, E. K., & Zhu, Y.‑G. (2022). Determinants of Household-Level Food Storage Practices and Outcomes on Food Safety and Security in Accra, Ghana. Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 11(20). |
| [32] | Mohammed, A.-R. S., Adjei, J., &Teye, K. (2018). Socioeconomic drivers of soybean consumption. Journal of Agricultural Extension, 22(2), 45–59. |
| [33] | Mungai, N., Otieno, P., &Njeri, C. (2024). The role of training in soybean meal adoption. African Journal of Extension Education, 40(2), 143–159. |
| [34] | Mohammed, S., &Abdulai, A. (2022). The impact of extension services on soybean adoption. Agricultural Extension Review, 34(1), 75–89. |
| [35] | Okello, J., Nar, A., &Omondi, I. (2017). Extension services and household soybean use in Kenya. Journal of Agricultural Extension and Rural Development, 9(10), 203–212. |
| [36] | Felix, T. (2020). Radio campaigns and soybean adoption in rural Ghana. Journal of Development Communication, 31(1), 11–23. |
| [37] | Elishiba, K. (2015). The role of women’s cooperatives in promoting soybeans in sub-Saharan Africa. African Development Review, 27(2), 170–180. |
| [38] | Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. |
| [39] | Ajzen, I. (2020). The theory of planned behavior: Frequently asked questions. Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies, 2(4), 314–324. |
| [40] | FAO. (1996). Rome Declaration on World Food Security and World Food Summit Plan of Action. Food and Agriculture Organization. |
| [41] | FAO. (2008). An introduction to the basic concepts of food security. Food and Agriculture Organization. |
| [42] | UNICEF. (2013). Improving child nutrition: The achievable imperative for global progress. United Nations Children’s Fund. |
| [43] | Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). (2021). 2021 Population and housing census: Summary report of final results. Accra: GSS. |
| [44] | Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. |
| [45] | Lohr, S. (2021). Sampling: Design and analysis (2nd ed.). Chapman & Hall/CRC. |
APA Style
Laila, S., Fagbemi, E. O., Adi, D. D. (2025). Household Utilization of Soybeans in East Gonja Municipality: Consumption Patterns, Perceptions, and Constraints. International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences, 14(6), 428-440. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17
ACS Style
Laila, S.; Fagbemi, E. O.; Adi, D. D. Household Utilization of Soybeans in East Gonja Municipality: Consumption Patterns, Perceptions, and Constraints. Int. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2025, 14(6), 428-440. doi: 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17
@article{10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17,
author = {Saaka Laila and Ellen Olu Fagbemi and Doreen Dedo Adi},
title = {Household Utilization of Soybeans in East Gonja Municipality: Consumption Patterns, Perceptions, and Constraints
},
journal = {International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences},
volume = {14},
number = {6},
pages = {428-440},
doi = {10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijnfs.20251406.17},
abstract = {Soybeans are widely cultivated in East Gonja, yet their household use remains uneven despite clear nutritional and livelihood benefits. This study assessed household consumption patterns, awareness and perceptions, and constraints shaping soybean utilization to inform targeted nutrition and livelihood interventions in the municipality. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was applied to a sample of 384 households selected through multi-stage cluster sampling. Quantitative data were collected via structured questionnaires and analysed in the Statical package for the social sciences (SPSS) (descriptive statistics, χ² tests, and binary logistic regression). Qualitative data from focus group discussions and key informant interviews were thematically analysed in NVivo to contextualize quantitative findings. Household utilization was high overall (289/384, 75.26%). Most users reported 1–2 uses in the prior 7 days (48.96%), with the majority indicating year-round use (58.85%). Typical monthly use clustered at 1–2kg (39.32%). Mothers were most often responsible for soybean meal preparation (94.46%), and local markets were the primary source (61.25%). Awareness of processing methods was high (87.50%); just over half had received preparation information (52.86%); nearly all believed recipe access would increase use (97.92%); and two-thirds reported household-level processing (67.71%). Bivariate analyses showed significant associations between utilization and sex, education, household size, and income (all p ≤.019), and between utilization and cultural acceptance, attitudes, awareness of processing, reported challenges, and belief that recipes would increase use (all p ≤.013). In the multivariable model (LR χ² = 182.688, p <.001; pseudo-R² = 0.737; n = 380), neutral attitude predicted markedly lower odds of utilization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.018, p <.001), while awareness of processing methods predicted higher odds (AOR = 3.338, p =.016). Sex, education, household size, and reported challenges were not significant after adjustment. Soybean consumption is common in East Gonja but is shaped by attitudes and know-how. Neutral dispositions toward soybean meals constrain use, whereas awareness of processing methods enables adoption. Routine preparation roles held by mothers and reliance on local markets frame day-to-day use. These findings point to practical levers for improving household nutrition through soy.
},
year = {2025}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Household Utilization of Soybeans in East Gonja Municipality: Consumption Patterns, Perceptions, and Constraints AU - Saaka Laila AU - Ellen Olu Fagbemi AU - Doreen Dedo Adi Y1 - 2025/11/28 PY - 2025 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17 DO - 10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17 T2 - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences JF - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences JO - International Journal of Nutrition and Food Sciences SP - 428 EP - 440 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2327-2716 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijnfs.20251406.17 AB - Soybeans are widely cultivated in East Gonja, yet their household use remains uneven despite clear nutritional and livelihood benefits. This study assessed household consumption patterns, awareness and perceptions, and constraints shaping soybean utilization to inform targeted nutrition and livelihood interventions in the municipality. A cross-sectional mixed-methods design was applied to a sample of 384 households selected through multi-stage cluster sampling. Quantitative data were collected via structured questionnaires and analysed in the Statical package for the social sciences (SPSS) (descriptive statistics, χ² tests, and binary logistic regression). Qualitative data from focus group discussions and key informant interviews were thematically analysed in NVivo to contextualize quantitative findings. Household utilization was high overall (289/384, 75.26%). Most users reported 1–2 uses in the prior 7 days (48.96%), with the majority indicating year-round use (58.85%). Typical monthly use clustered at 1–2kg (39.32%). Mothers were most often responsible for soybean meal preparation (94.46%), and local markets were the primary source (61.25%). Awareness of processing methods was high (87.50%); just over half had received preparation information (52.86%); nearly all believed recipe access would increase use (97.92%); and two-thirds reported household-level processing (67.71%). Bivariate analyses showed significant associations between utilization and sex, education, household size, and income (all p ≤.019), and between utilization and cultural acceptance, attitudes, awareness of processing, reported challenges, and belief that recipes would increase use (all p ≤.013). In the multivariable model (LR χ² = 182.688, p <.001; pseudo-R² = 0.737; n = 380), neutral attitude predicted markedly lower odds of utilization (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 0.018, p <.001), while awareness of processing methods predicted higher odds (AOR = 3.338, p =.016). Sex, education, household size, and reported challenges were not significant after adjustment. Soybean consumption is common in East Gonja but is shaped by attitudes and know-how. Neutral dispositions toward soybean meals constrain use, whereas awareness of processing methods enables adoption. Routine preparation roles held by mothers and reliance on local markets frame day-to-day use. These findings point to practical levers for improving household nutrition through soy. VL - 14 IS - 6 ER -