This review report examines the problem of cold-start latency in serverless inference for large language models (LLMs) and surveys recent systems that address it, with a particular focus on ServerlessLLM. In serverless environments, loading multi-hundred-gigabyte LLM checkpoints and initializing GPU resources can dominate end-to-end latency, making real-time applications such as conversational agents and translation services difficult to deploy cost-efficiently. The report first summarizes the cold-start problem and common mitigation strategies in today's Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) platforms, including container warming, host-side checkpoint caching, and cluster-level storage servers. It then reviews the design of ServerlessLLM, which exploits underutilized multi-tier storage in GPU servers, a loading-optimized checkpoint format, live inference migration based on token-level state transfer, and a startup-time-aware model scheduler. Additional methods from recent literature, such as RainbowCake's layered container caching, and the cold-start handling mechanisms of major cloud providers are also discussed. Drawing on the evaluation presented in the original work, the report highlights that multi-tier checkpoint loading and live migration reduce model startup time by up to 6-8× compared to conventional formats, and deliver up to 28× lower startup latency than Ray Serve for large models in realistic traces. The review concludes by outlining open challenges and future directions, including integrating model compression, multi-level inference pipelines, and advanced memory-offloading techniques to further improve the scalability and efficiency of serverless LLM inference.
| Published in | Internet of Things and Cloud Computing (Volume 14, Issue 3) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11 |
| Page(s) | 56-67 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Serverless Inference, Cold-start Latency, Large Language Models (LLMs), Multi-tier Storage, Checkpoint Optimization, GPU Scheduling
| [1] |
I. E. Akkus et al., "SAND: Towards High-Performance Serverless Computing," in USENIX Annual Technical Conference, pp. 923–935, 2018. Available:
https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc18/presentation/akkus Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [2] |
Anyscale, "Loading LLaMA-2 70B 20× Faster With Anyscale Endpoints," 2025. Available:
https://www.anyscale.com/blog/loading-llama-2-70b-20x-faster-with-anyscale-endpoints Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [3] |
AWS, "Amazon CloudWatch," 2025. Available:
https://aws.amazon.com/cloudwatch/ Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [4] |
Microsoft Azure, "Azure Tips and Tricks: Tip 260," 2025. Available:
https://microsoft.github.io/AzureTipsAndTricks/blog/tip260.html Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [5] |
Microsoft Azure, "Improving Azure Functions Cold Starts," 2025. Available:
https://techcommunity.microsoft.com/t5/apps-on-azure-blog/our-latest-work-to-improve-azure-functions-cold-starts/ba-p/4164500 Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [6] |
Google Cloud, "Configuring Warmup Requests," 2025. Available:
https://cloud.google.com/appengine/docs/legacy/standard/go111/configuring-warmup-requests Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [7] |
Google Cloud, "Instance Autoscaling," 2025. Available:
https://cloud.google.com/run/docs/about-instance-autoscaling Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [8] |
Google Cloud, "Mitigating Cold Starts on Cloud Run," 2025. Available:
https://medium.com/google-cloud/3-solutions-to-mitigate-the-cold-starts-on-cloud-run-8c60f0ae7894 Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [9] |
J. Daly, "Lambda Warmer," 2025. Available:
https://github.com/jeremydaly/lambda-warmer Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [10] |
Dashbird, "Dashbird Serverless Monitoring," 2025. Available:
https://dashbird.io/ Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [11] | D. Du et al., "Catalyzer: Sub-millisecond Startup for Serverless Computing with Initialization-less Booting," in Proceedings of the Twenty-Fifth International Conference on Architectural Support for Programming Languages and Operating Systems (ASPLOS '20), pp. 467–481, 2020, |
| [12] | X. Liu et al., "FaaSLight: General Application-level Cold-start Latency Optimization for Function-as-a-Service in Serverless Computing," ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, 2023, |
| [13] |
Y. Fu et al., "ServerlessLLM: Low-Latency Serverless Inference for Large Language Models," arXiv:2401.14351, 2024. Available:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.14351 Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [14] | M. Ghorbian and M. Ghobaei-Arani, "A Survey on the Cold Start Latency Approaches in Serverless Computing: an Optimization-Based Perspective," Computing, 2024, |
| [15] | M. Golec, G. K. Walia, M. Kumar, F. Cuadrado, S. S. Gill, and S. Uhlig, "Cold Start Latency in Serverless Computing: A Systematic Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions," ACM Computing Surveys, vol. 57, no. 3, pp. 1–36, 2024, |
| [16] |
IBM, "What Is Serverless Computing?" 2025. Available:
https://www.ibm.com/topics/serverless Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [17] | K. Kaffes et al., "Centralized Core-granular Scheduling for Serverless Functions," in Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Cloud Computing, pp. 158–164, 2019, |
| [18] |
P.-M. Lin and A. Glikson, "Mitigating Cold Starts in Serverless Platforms: A Pool-Based Approach," arXiv:1903.12221, 2019. Available:
https://arxiv.org/abs/1903.12221 Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [19] | G. McGrath and P. R. Brenner, "Serverless Computing: Design, Implementation, and Performance," in 2017 IEEE 37th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops (ICDCSW), pp. 405–410, 2017, |
| [20] |
A. Mohan et al., "Agile Cold Starts for Scalable Serverless," in 11th USENIX Workshop on Hot Topics in Cloud Computing (HotCloud 19), 2019. Available:
https://www.usenix.org/conference/hotcloud19/presentation/mohan Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [21] |
E. Oakes et al., "Rapid Task Provisioning with Serverless-Optimized Containers," in USENIX Annual Technical Conference (ATC 18), pp. 57–70, 2018. Available:
https://www.usenix.org/conference/atc18/presentation/oakes Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [22] | G. Persson and W. Branth Sj"oberg, "Mitigating Serverless Cold Starts Through Predicting Computational Resource Demand: Predicting Function Invocations Based on Real-Time User Navigation," bachelor's thesis, J"onk"oping University, 2023. |
| [23] | S. Rajbhandari et al., "ZeRO-Infinity: Breaking the GPU Memory Wall for Extreme Scale Deep Learning," in SC21: International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage and Analysis, 2021, |
| [24] |
Sedai, "AWS Autonomous Concurrency," 2025. Available:
https://www.sedai.io/blog/the-end-of-cold-starts-autonomous-concurrency-for-aws-lambda Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [25] |
Y. Sheng et al., "FlexGen: High-Throughput Generative Inference of Large Language Models with a Single GPU," arXiv:2303.06865, 2023. Available:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.06865 Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [26] | S. Shillaker and P. R. Pietzuch, "A Provider-Friendly Serverless Framework for Latency-Critical Applications," 2018. Available: |
| [27] |
SlideShare, "Become a Serverless Black Belt: Optimizing Your Serverless Applications," 2025. Available:
https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/become-a-serverless-black-belt-optimizing-your-serverless-applications-srv401-reinvent-2017/840310167 Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [28] |
Snowflake, "LLM Inference Guide," 2025. Available:
https://www.snowflake.com/guides/llm-inference/ Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [29] | P. Vahidinia et al., "Cold Start in Serverless Computing: Current Trends and Mitigation Strategies," in 2020 International Conference on Omni-layer Intelligent Systems (COINS), pp. 1–7, 2020, |
| [30] | Y. Wang et al., "Tabi: An Efficient Multi-Level Inference System for Large Language Models," in Proceedings of the 18th European Conference on Computer Systems (EuroSys '23), pp. 233–248, 2023, |
| [31] | J. Wen, Z. Chen, X. Jin, and X. Liu, "Rise of the Planet of Serverless Computing: A Systematic Review," ACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology, vol. 32, no. 5, pp. 1–61, 2023, |
| [32] |
Wikipedia, "Serverless Computing," 2025. Available:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serverless\_computing Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [33] |
B. Wu et al., "Fast Distributed Inference Serving for Large Language Models," arXiv:2305.05920, 2023. Available:
https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.05920 Accessed: Jan. 1, 2025. |
| [34] | H. Yu, R. Basu Roy, et al., "RainbowCake: Mitigating Cold-starts in Serverless with Layer-wise Container Caching and Sharing," in ASPLOS '24, 2024, |
| [35] | K. Zhao, Z. Zhou, L. Jiao, S. Cai, F. Xu, and X. Chen, "Taming Serverless Cold Start of Cloud Model Inference With Edge Computing," IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, vol. 23, no. 8, pp. 8111–8128, 2024, |
APA Style
Ghosh, H. (2026). Enabling Efficient Serverless Inference Serving for LLM (Large Language Model) in the Cloud. Internet of Things and Cloud Computing, 14(3), 56-67. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11
ACS Style
Ghosh, H. Enabling Efficient Serverless Inference Serving for LLM (Large Language Model) in the Cloud. Internet Things Cloud Comput. 2026, 14(3), 56-67. doi: 10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11
@article{10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11,
author = {Himel Ghosh},
title = {Enabling Efficient Serverless Inference Serving for LLM (Large Language Model) in the Cloud},
journal = {Internet of Things and Cloud Computing},
volume = {14},
number = {3},
pages = {56-67},
doi = {10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.iotcc.20261403.11},
abstract = {This review report examines the problem of cold-start latency in serverless inference for large language models (LLMs) and surveys recent systems that address it, with a particular focus on ServerlessLLM. In serverless environments, loading multi-hundred-gigabyte LLM checkpoints and initializing GPU resources can dominate end-to-end latency, making real-time applications such as conversational agents and translation services difficult to deploy cost-efficiently. The report first summarizes the cold-start problem and common mitigation strategies in today's Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) platforms, including container warming, host-side checkpoint caching, and cluster-level storage servers. It then reviews the design of ServerlessLLM, which exploits underutilized multi-tier storage in GPU servers, a loading-optimized checkpoint format, live inference migration based on token-level state transfer, and a startup-time-aware model scheduler. Additional methods from recent literature, such as RainbowCake's layered container caching, and the cold-start handling mechanisms of major cloud providers are also discussed. Drawing on the evaluation presented in the original work, the report highlights that multi-tier checkpoint loading and live migration reduce model startup time by up to 6-8× compared to conventional formats, and deliver up to 28× lower startup latency than Ray Serve for large models in realistic traces. The review concludes by outlining open challenges and future directions, including integrating model compression, multi-level inference pipelines, and advanced memory-offloading techniques to further improve the scalability and efficiency of serverless LLM inference.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Enabling Efficient Serverless Inference Serving for LLM (Large Language Model) in the Cloud AU - Himel Ghosh Y1 - 2026/10/12 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11 DO - 10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11 T2 - Internet of Things and Cloud Computing JF - Internet of Things and Cloud Computing JO - Internet of Things and Cloud Computing SP - 56 EP - 67 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2376-7731 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.iotcc.20261403.11 AB - This review report examines the problem of cold-start latency in serverless inference for large language models (LLMs) and surveys recent systems that address it, with a particular focus on ServerlessLLM. In serverless environments, loading multi-hundred-gigabyte LLM checkpoints and initializing GPU resources can dominate end-to-end latency, making real-time applications such as conversational agents and translation services difficult to deploy cost-efficiently. The report first summarizes the cold-start problem and common mitigation strategies in today's Function-as-a-Service (FaaS) platforms, including container warming, host-side checkpoint caching, and cluster-level storage servers. It then reviews the design of ServerlessLLM, which exploits underutilized multi-tier storage in GPU servers, a loading-optimized checkpoint format, live inference migration based on token-level state transfer, and a startup-time-aware model scheduler. Additional methods from recent literature, such as RainbowCake's layered container caching, and the cold-start handling mechanisms of major cloud providers are also discussed. Drawing on the evaluation presented in the original work, the report highlights that multi-tier checkpoint loading and live migration reduce model startup time by up to 6-8× compared to conventional formats, and deliver up to 28× lower startup latency than Ray Serve for large models in realistic traces. The review concludes by outlining open challenges and future directions, including integrating model compression, multi-level inference pipelines, and advanced memory-offloading techniques to further improve the scalability and efficiency of serverless LLM inference. VL - 14 IS - 3 ER -