Nigerian heavy crude oil has substantial potential as a transportable energy resource, but its high viscosity creates major challenges for pipeline flow. This study evaluated oil-in-water emulsification as a viscosity-reduction strategy for Agbabu heavy crude oil using a full factorial design. Emulsions were prepared at two temperatures (25 and 75°C), two NaOH concentrations (0.07 and 0.10 M), and two NaCl salinities (1 and 4 wt%) at a fixed oil-to-water ratio of 65:35 by weight, with butanol used as a co-surfactant. The emulsions were pumped through a 3.20 m pilot-scale pipeline and assessed in terms of flow rate, velocity, pressure drop, Reynolds number, apparent viscosity, and oil recovery after thermal demulsification. The results showed that temperature was the dominant factor affecting transportability. The formulation prepared at 75°C with 0.10 M NaOH and 4 wt% NaCl produced the most stable emulsion, the highest flow rate, the lowest pressure drop, and the smallest oil loss after pumping. Lower-temperature formulations were less stable and displayed substantially higher losses. Overall, the study demonstrates that appropriately formulated alkaline oil-in-water emulsions can significantly improve the pipeline transport of Nigerian heavy oil and may reduce the pumping energy required for future field applications.
| Published in | Journal of Energy and Natural Resources (Volume 15, Issue 2) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11 |
| Page(s) | 45-50 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Heavy Crude Oil, Oil-In-Water Emulsion, Pipeline Transport, Viscosity Reduction, Alkaline Stabilizer
Run | Temperature (°C) | Heavy oil (%) | Water (%) | NaOH (M) | NaCl (wt%) | Butanol (mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 25 | 65 | 35 | 0.07 | 1.0 | 106.25 |
2 | 25 | 65 | 35 | 0.07 | 4.0 | 106.25 |
3 | 25 | 65 | 35 | 0.10 | 1.0 | 106.25 |
4 | 25 | 65 | 35 | 0.10 | 4.0 | 106.25 |
5 | 75 | 65 | 35 | 0.07 | 1.0 | 106.25 |
6 | 75 | 65 | 35 | 0.07 | 4.0 | 106.25 |
7 | 75 | 65 | 35 | 0.10 | 1.0 | 106.25 |
8 | 75 | 65 | 35 | 0.10 | 4.0 | 106.25 |
Run | Vol. Pumped (×10^-3 m^3) | Time (s) | Flow Rate (m^3/s) | Velocity (m/s) | Δp (Pa) | Re (×10^3) | Apparent Viscosity (Pa·s) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 34.47 | 10 | 7.96×10^-5 | 0.25 | 5.65×10^3 | 5.65 | 2.50×10^-3 |
2 | 13.79 | 6 | 1.37×10^-4 | 0.42 | 8.47×10^3 | 8.47 | 2.50×10^-3 |
3 | 20.68 | 8 | 9.95×10^-4 | 3.13 | 4.51×10^3 | 4.51 | 2.50×10^-3 |
4 | 10.34 | 5 | 1.59×10^-3 | 5.00 | 1.05×10^3 | 1.05 | 2.50×10^-3 |
5 | 24.13 | 8 | 9.95×10^-4 | 3.13 | 3.53×10^3 | 3.53 | 2.50×10^-3 |
6 | 11.72 | 5 | 1.59×10^-3 | 5.00 | 1.03×10^3 | 1.03 | 2.50×10^-3 |
7 | 22.75 | 6 | 1.38×10^-3 | 4.33 | 6.26×10^2 | 0.626 | 2.60×10^-3 |
8 | 13.79 | 3 | 2.76×10^-3 | 8.67 | 1.47×10^2 | 0.147 | 2.60×10^-3 |
Run | Emulsion Transported (vol%) | Emulsion Transported (wt%) | Oil in Emulsion Before Pump (%) | Oil After Pump (%) | Oil Loss (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | 70.0 | 82.2 | 65.0 | 60.7 | 4.3 |
2 | 83.3 | 88.2 | 65.0 | 62.1 | 2.9 |
3 | 52.0 | 47.1 | 65.0 | 52.0 | 13.0 |
4 | 64.0 | 55.6 | 65.0 | 50.1 | 14.9 |
5 | 30.0 | 42.5 | 65.0 | 48.7 | 16.3 |
6 | 91.3 | 91.7 | 65.0 | 62.6 | 2.4 |
7 | 61.5 | 50.0 | 65.0 | 57.2 | 7.8 |
8 | 92.3 | 88.9 | 65.0 | 63.3 | 1.7 |
O/W | Oil-in-Water |
NaOH | Sodium Hydroxide |
NaCl | Sodium Chloride |
wt% | Weight Percent |
M | Molarity (mol/L) |
m | Meter |
cm | Centimeter |
mL | Milliliter |
kg | Kilogram |
rpm | Revolutions per Minute |
s | Second |
°C | Degrees Celsius |
Δp | Pressure Drop |
Re | Reynolds Number |
Pa | Pascal |
Pa·s | Pascal-second (Dynamic Viscosity) |
m³/s | Cubic Meters per Second (Flow Rate) |
m/s | Meters per Second (Velocity) |
ORCID | Open Researcher and Contributor ID |
| [1] | Abdulrahman, M. A., Sanni, S. E., & Peters, E. J. (2023). Pipeline transport of viscous crude oils using emulsification techniques. Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering, 2(1), 45–58. |
| [2] | Adewuyi, A. O., Salami, L. A., & Okonkwo, C. C. (2023). Emulsion flow behavior of Nigerian heavy crude in pipeline systems. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 223, 111589. |
| [3] | Bello, M. T., Akinlade, O. O., & Yusuf, R. O. (2024). Surfactant-enhanced viscosity reduction in heavy oil transportation. Energy Reports, 10, 245–256. |
| [4] | Chen, X., Li, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). Advances in oil-in-water emulsions for heavy oil transport. Chemical Engineering Journal, 468, 143512. |
| [5] | Eze, P. N., Okafor, I. S., & Chukwu, G. N. (2024). Demulsification strategies for crude oil recovery in emulsion transport systems. Fuel Processing Technology, 245, 107689. |
| [6] | Garcia, M. C., Torres, D. F., & Lopez, R. (2023). Flow assurance challenges in heavy crude oil pipelines. Energy & Fuels, 37(5), 3890–3902. |
| [7] | Ibrahim, H. K., Musa, U. M., & Lawal, S. A. (2025). Rheological characterization of Nigerian heavy crude emulsions under varying flow conditions. Journal of Energy Resources Technology, 147(2), 023001. |
| [8] | Kumar, R., Singh, P., & Mohanty, K. K. (2024). Emulsion-based viscosity reduction techniques for heavy oil. Fuel, 350, 128756. |
| [9] | Liang, J., Zhou, H., & Sun, Q. (2025). Green surfactants for crude oil emulsification and transport. Journal of Cleaner Production, 412, 137389. |
| [10] | Nwachukwu, C. E., Udeh, C. F., & Okoye, N. E. (2024). Corrosion and microbial challenges in oil-water emulsion pipelines. Corrosion Science, 216, 111012. |
| [11] | Ogunleye, O. O., Ajayi, T. O., & Oladipo, A. A. (2023). Sustainable approaches to heavy crude oil transportation in Nigeria. Sustainable Energy Technologies and Assessments, 57, 103214. |
| [12] | Okolie, J. A., & Zhang, L. (2023). Interfacial properties and stability of crude oil emulsions: A review. Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects, 656, 130427. |
| [13] | Onoja, E. O., Ibrahim, J. S., & Bala, A. (2023). Characterization of Nigerian heavy crude oils for flow improvement studies. Petroleum Research, 8(3), 210–219. |
| [14] | Yakubu, M. L., Danjuma, G. G., & Abdullahi, B. (2025). Nanoparticle-assisted emulsification of heavy crude oil for improved transport efficiency. Nanotechnology for Environmental Engineering, 10(1), 15. |
| [15] | Zhang, T., Liu, H., & Chen, S. (2024). Stability mechanisms of oil-water emulsions in pipeline transport. Langmuir, 40(12), 4567–4578. |
APA Style
Ademodi, B. T., Olanrewaju, A. B. (2026). Emulsion-Based Transportation of Nigerian Heavy Oil Using Alkaline Oil-in-Water Emulsions. Journal of Energy and Natural Resources, 15(2), 45-50. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11
ACS Style
Ademodi, B. T.; Olanrewaju, A. B. Emulsion-Based Transportation of Nigerian Heavy Oil Using Alkaline Oil-in-Water Emulsions. J. Energy Nat. Resour. 2026, 15(2), 45-50. doi: 10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11
@article{10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11,
author = {Bayonle Tolani Ademodi and Adebayo Bamidele Olanrewaju},
title = {Emulsion-Based Transportation of Nigerian Heavy Oil Using Alkaline Oil-in-Water Emulsions},
journal = {Journal of Energy and Natural Resources},
volume = {15},
number = {2},
pages = {45-50},
doi = {10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jenr.20261502.11},
abstract = {Nigerian heavy crude oil has substantial potential as a transportable energy resource, but its high viscosity creates major challenges for pipeline flow. This study evaluated oil-in-water emulsification as a viscosity-reduction strategy for Agbabu heavy crude oil using a full factorial design. Emulsions were prepared at two temperatures (25 and 75°C), two NaOH concentrations (0.07 and 0.10 M), and two NaCl salinities (1 and 4 wt%) at a fixed oil-to-water ratio of 65:35 by weight, with butanol used as a co-surfactant. The emulsions were pumped through a 3.20 m pilot-scale pipeline and assessed in terms of flow rate, velocity, pressure drop, Reynolds number, apparent viscosity, and oil recovery after thermal demulsification. The results showed that temperature was the dominant factor affecting transportability. The formulation prepared at 75°C with 0.10 M NaOH and 4 wt% NaCl produced the most stable emulsion, the highest flow rate, the lowest pressure drop, and the smallest oil loss after pumping. Lower-temperature formulations were less stable and displayed substantially higher losses. Overall, the study demonstrates that appropriately formulated alkaline oil-in-water emulsions can significantly improve the pipeline transport of Nigerian heavy oil and may reduce the pumping energy required for future field applications.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - Emulsion-Based Transportation of Nigerian Heavy Oil Using Alkaline Oil-in-Water Emulsions AU - Bayonle Tolani Ademodi AU - Adebayo Bamidele Olanrewaju Y1 - 2026/05/16 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11 T2 - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources JF - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources JO - Journal of Energy and Natural Resources SP - 45 EP - 50 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2330-7404 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jenr.20261502.11 AB - Nigerian heavy crude oil has substantial potential as a transportable energy resource, but its high viscosity creates major challenges for pipeline flow. This study evaluated oil-in-water emulsification as a viscosity-reduction strategy for Agbabu heavy crude oil using a full factorial design. Emulsions were prepared at two temperatures (25 and 75°C), two NaOH concentrations (0.07 and 0.10 M), and two NaCl salinities (1 and 4 wt%) at a fixed oil-to-water ratio of 65:35 by weight, with butanol used as a co-surfactant. The emulsions were pumped through a 3.20 m pilot-scale pipeline and assessed in terms of flow rate, velocity, pressure drop, Reynolds number, apparent viscosity, and oil recovery after thermal demulsification. The results showed that temperature was the dominant factor affecting transportability. The formulation prepared at 75°C with 0.10 M NaOH and 4 wt% NaCl produced the most stable emulsion, the highest flow rate, the lowest pressure drop, and the smallest oil loss after pumping. Lower-temperature formulations were less stable and displayed substantially higher losses. Overall, the study demonstrates that appropriately formulated alkaline oil-in-water emulsions can significantly improve the pipeline transport of Nigerian heavy oil and may reduce the pumping energy required for future field applications. VL - 15 IS - 2 ER -