Language-related conflicts pose significant challenges in multicultural and multilingual institutions, often disrupting productivity and eroding workplace harmony. This study examines the role of language in conflict resolution and mediation at the Institute of Accountancy Arusha (IAA), a diverse academic institution in Tanzania. The research addresses three key objectives: to analyse language-related factors that trigger conflicts among staff, evaluate the effectiveness of current conflict resolution practices, and provide evidence-based recommendations to enhance HR practices. Using a qualitative research design, the data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with IAA staff and stakeholders. The findings reveal that language barriers, cultural differences, and communication styles significantly influence conflict dynamics at IAA. Misunderstandings arising from language proficiency gaps, direct or indirect communication styles, and cultural nuances in interpreting words and non-verbal cues were identified as key contributors to conflicts. While formal mediation processes exist, their effectiveness is limited by delays, bureaucracy, and a lack of focus on underlying linguistic and cultural barriers. Participants emphasized the need for cultural sensitivity training, language support resources, and informal conflict resolution mechanisms. The study recommends implementing cross-cultural communication workshops, peer mediation programs, and leadership initiatives to promote inclusivity and harmony. These findings contribute to the broader understanding of language-related conflicts in multicultural settings and offer practical strategies for improving conflict resolution practices at IAA and similar institutions.
| Published in | Journal of Human Resource Management (Volume 14, Issue 1) |
| DOI | 10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11 |
| Page(s) | 1-11 |
| Creative Commons |
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited. |
| Copyright |
Copyright © The Author(s), 2026. Published by Science Publishing Group |
Language-related Conflicts, Conflict Resolution, Mediation, Multicultural Institutions, Communication Barriers, Cultural Sensitivity, Institute of Accountancy Arusha
| [1] | Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. |
| [2] | Carment, D., & James, P. (2018). Winning the peace: Strategies for post-conflict stability. Routledge. |
| [3] | Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage Publications. |
| [4] | Detenber, B. H. (2006). Language and conflict resolution: The role of communication in resolving workplace conflicts. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 34(3), 249–267. |
| [5] | Folger, J. P., Poole, M. S., & Stutman, R. K. (2020). Working through conflict: Strategies for relationships, groups, and organizations (9th ed.). Routledge. |
| [6] | Gelfand, M. J., Brett, J. M., & Gunia, B. C. (2019). The science of conflict: Roots, current controversies, and future directions. Annual Review of Psychology, 70, 233–258. |
| [7] | Gudykunst, W. B., & Kim, Y. Y. (2017). Communicating with strangers: An approach to intercultural communication (5th ed.). McGraw-Hill. |
| [8] | Hunsaker, P. L., & Alessandra, T. J. (2018). The new art of managing people: Person-to-person skills, guidelines, and techniques every manager needs to guide, direct, and motivate the team. Simon and Schuster. |
| [9] | Jackson, S. E., & Ruderman, M. N. (1999). Diversity in work teams: Research paradigms for a changing workplace. American Psychological Association. |
| [10] | Kolb, D. M. (2019). When talk works: Profiles of mediators. Jossey-Bass. |
| [11] | Lewicki, R. J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2016). Essentials of negotiation (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. |
| [12] | Oetzel, J. G., & Ting-Toomey, S. (2003). Face concerns in interpersonal conflict: A cross-cultural empirical test of the face-negotiation theory. Communication Research, 30(6), 599–624. |
| [13] | Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544. |
| [14] | Pentland, B. T., & Feldman, M. S. (2005). Organizational routines as a unit of analysis. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14(5), 793–815. |
| [15] | Peterson, M. F. (1997). The role of language in conflict resolution. International Journal of Conflict Management, 8(3), 218–240. |
| [16] | Pruitt, D. G., & Kimmel, M. J. (2019). Social conflict: Escalation, stalemate, and settlement (3rd ed.). McGraw-Hill. |
| [17] | Rahim, M. A. (2017). Managing conflict in organizations (4th ed.). Routledge. |
| [18] | Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2018). Research methods for business students (8th ed.). Pearson Education. |
| [19] | Smith, J. (2017). Language and conflict resolution: The role of communication in resolving workplace conflicts. Journal of Organizational Behaviour, 38(5), 678–695. |
| [20] | Thomas, D. C., & Peterson, M. F. (2017). Cross-cultural management: Essential concepts (4th ed.). Sage Publications. |
| [21] | Ting-Toomey, S. (1985). Toward a theory of conflict and culture. In W. B. Gudykunst, L. P. Stewart, & S. Ting-Toomey (Eds.), Communication, culture, and organizational processes (pp. 71–86). Sage Publications. |
| [22] | Ting-Toomey, S. (2012). Communicating across cultures (2nd ed.). Guilford Press. |
| [23] | Ting-Toomey, S., & Oetzel, J. G. (2001). Managing intercultural conflict effectively. Sage Publications. |
| [24] | Wani, M., & Munch, J. (2013). Managing diversity in multicultural organizations. Journal of International Business Studies, 44(5), 499–514. |
APA Style
Kalokola, N. M., Kipara, K. J. (2026). The Role of Language in Resolving Conflicts and Building Harmony at the Institute of Accountancy Arusha. Journal of Human Resource Management, 14(1), 1-11. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11
ACS Style
Kalokola, N. M.; Kipara, K. J. The Role of Language in Resolving Conflicts and Building Harmony at the Institute of Accountancy Arusha. J. Hum. Resour. Manag. 2026, 14(1), 1-11. doi: 10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11
@article{10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11,
author = {Nasibu Musa Kalokola and Kipara Josephat Kipara},
title = {The Role of Language in Resolving Conflicts and Building Harmony at the Institute of Accountancy Arusha},
journal = {Journal of Human Resource Management},
volume = {14},
number = {1},
pages = {1-11},
doi = {10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11},
url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11},
eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.jhrm.20261401.11},
abstract = {Language-related conflicts pose significant challenges in multicultural and multilingual institutions, often disrupting productivity and eroding workplace harmony. This study examines the role of language in conflict resolution and mediation at the Institute of Accountancy Arusha (IAA), a diverse academic institution in Tanzania. The research addresses three key objectives: to analyse language-related factors that trigger conflicts among staff, evaluate the effectiveness of current conflict resolution practices, and provide evidence-based recommendations to enhance HR practices. Using a qualitative research design, the data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with IAA staff and stakeholders. The findings reveal that language barriers, cultural differences, and communication styles significantly influence conflict dynamics at IAA. Misunderstandings arising from language proficiency gaps, direct or indirect communication styles, and cultural nuances in interpreting words and non-verbal cues were identified as key contributors to conflicts. While formal mediation processes exist, their effectiveness is limited by delays, bureaucracy, and a lack of focus on underlying linguistic and cultural barriers. Participants emphasized the need for cultural sensitivity training, language support resources, and informal conflict resolution mechanisms. The study recommends implementing cross-cultural communication workshops, peer mediation programs, and leadership initiatives to promote inclusivity and harmony. These findings contribute to the broader understanding of language-related conflicts in multicultural settings and offer practical strategies for improving conflict resolution practices at IAA and similar institutions.},
year = {2026}
}
TY - JOUR T1 - The Role of Language in Resolving Conflicts and Building Harmony at the Institute of Accountancy Arusha AU - Nasibu Musa Kalokola AU - Kipara Josephat Kipara Y1 - 2026/01/16 PY - 2026 N1 - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11 DO - 10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11 T2 - Journal of Human Resource Management JF - Journal of Human Resource Management JO - Journal of Human Resource Management SP - 1 EP - 11 PB - Science Publishing Group SN - 2331-0715 UR - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.jhrm.20261401.11 AB - Language-related conflicts pose significant challenges in multicultural and multilingual institutions, often disrupting productivity and eroding workplace harmony. This study examines the role of language in conflict resolution and mediation at the Institute of Accountancy Arusha (IAA), a diverse academic institution in Tanzania. The research addresses three key objectives: to analyse language-related factors that trigger conflicts among staff, evaluate the effectiveness of current conflict resolution practices, and provide evidence-based recommendations to enhance HR practices. Using a qualitative research design, the data were collected through in-depth interviews and focus group discussions with IAA staff and stakeholders. The findings reveal that language barriers, cultural differences, and communication styles significantly influence conflict dynamics at IAA. Misunderstandings arising from language proficiency gaps, direct or indirect communication styles, and cultural nuances in interpreting words and non-verbal cues were identified as key contributors to conflicts. While formal mediation processes exist, their effectiveness is limited by delays, bureaucracy, and a lack of focus on underlying linguistic and cultural barriers. Participants emphasized the need for cultural sensitivity training, language support resources, and informal conflict resolution mechanisms. The study recommends implementing cross-cultural communication workshops, peer mediation programs, and leadership initiatives to promote inclusivity and harmony. These findings contribute to the broader understanding of language-related conflicts in multicultural settings and offer practical strategies for improving conflict resolution practices at IAA and similar institutions. VL - 14 IS - 1 ER -