Research Article | | Peer-Reviewed

Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal with Cowpea Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Sasso Chickens

Received: 21 March 2025     Accepted: 7 April 2025     Published: 29 April 2025
Views:       Downloads:
Abstract

Soybean meal is a primary protein source in the poultry feed industry due to its high protein content and good amino acid profile. However, limited supply and high import costs in Tanzania make the cost of commercial feeds high. This study evaluated the effects of replacing soybean meal with cowpea meal on Sasso chickens' growth performance and meat characteristics. Five diets were formulated such that cowpea meal replaced soybean meal by 0 % (T1), 25 % (T2), 50 % (T3), 75 % (T4), and 100% (T5). A total of 150 one-month-old Sasso chickens with weights ranging from 603.33 ± 10.04 to 618.79 ± 15.30 g were randomly assigned to the five dietary treatments and reared for nine weeks. The amount of feed provided and the refusals were recorded daily and body weight was measured once per week. At the end of the experiment, feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. In addition, a total of 30 chickens, six chickens per treatment, were randomly selected and slaughtered to determine carcass characteristics. The chickens under T5 had higher (P ≤ 0.001) average feed intake (120.76 ± 1.43 g/d), final body weight (2624.56 ± 62 g), weight gain (1824.37 ± 42.43 g), daily weight gain (31.91 ± 0.90 g/d), slaughter body weight (2592.53 ± 133.73 g) and carcass weight (1988.80 ± 137.00 g) than those on the other treatments. The chickens on T1 had the lowest values for the same parameters. The FCR ranged from 3.77 ± 0.04 in T3 to 4.37 ± 0.06 in T2. However, the meat of the chickens in T1 had higher crude protein (21.59 ± 0.71 %) and lower fat contents (10.24 ± 1.19 %) than those in T5 (P ≤ 0.05) (18.59 ± 0.82 % CP and 16.60 ± 1.06 % fat). The study concludes that cowpea meal can completely replace soybean meal as an alternative plant protein source in poultry diets.

Published in International Journal of Animal Science and Technology (Volume 9, Issue 2)
DOI 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15
Page(s) 61-73
Creative Commons

This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, provided the original work is properly cited.

Copyright

Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Science Publishing Group

Keywords

Cowpea Meal, Daily Weight Gain, Feed Intake, Soybean Meal, Meat Quality, Weight Gain

References
[1] Cao Y., & Li D. Impact of increased demand for animal protein products in Asian countries: Implications on global food security. Animal frontiers. 2013, 1; 3(3): 48-55.
[2] Mottet, A., & Tempio, G. Global poultry production: current state and future outlook and challenges. World's poultry science journal. 2017, 73(2), 245-256.
[3] Daghir, N., Diab-El-Harake, M., & Kharroubi, S. Poultry production and its effects on food security in the Middle Eastern and North African region. Journal of Applied Poultry Research, 2021. 30(1), 100110.
[4] Birhanu M. Y., Osei-Amponsah R, Yeboah Obese F, & Dessie T. Smallholder poultry production in the context of increasing global food prices: roles in poverty reduction and food security. Animal Frontiers. 2023, 1; 13(1): 17-25.
[5] Mallick, P., Biswal, J. N Muduli, K., & Pumwa, J. Broiler poultry feed cost optimization using linear programming technique. Journal of Operations and Strategic Planning. 2020, 3(1), 31-57.
[6] He, W., Li, P., & Wu, G. Amino acid nutrition and metabolism in chickens. Amino acids in nutrition and health: Advances in Experimental Medicine and Biology. 2021, 109-131.
[7] Frempong, N. S., Nortey, T. N., Paulk, C., & Stark, C. R. Evaluating the Effect of replacing fish meal in broiler diets with either Soybean meal or poultry by-product Meal on Broiler Performance and total feed cost per kilogram of gain. Journal of Applied Poultry Research. 2019, 28(4), 912-918.
[8] Mengistu, S., Feyissa, F., & Kebede, G. Progress of Forage Legumes Breeding and Genetics Research in Ethiopia: A review. Ethiopian Journal of Crop Science. 2018, 1(1), 153-158.
[9] Osipitan O. A., Fields JS, Lo S,& Cuvaca I. Production systems and prospects of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) in the United States. Agronomy. 2021, 16; 11(11): 2312.
[10] Igomu, E., & Idoga, S. Evaluation of soils for cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L.) production: A case study of siwes farms of University of Agriculture Makurdi. International Journal of Plant & Soil Science. 2017, 15(3), 1-8.
[11] Abebe, B. K., & Alemayehu, M. T. A review of the nutritional use of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp) for human and animal diets. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research. 2022, 10, 100383.
[12] Kalyan, K., Gurjar, D., Kumar, B., & Kumar, T. V. The Role of Grain Legumes in Enhancing Soil Health and Promoting Sustainable Agricultural Practices: A Review. Journal of Experimental Agriculture International. 2024, 46(8), 344-354.
[13] Embaye, T. N., Ameha, N., & Yusuf, Y. Effect of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata) grain on growth performance of Cobb 500 broiler chickens. International Journal of Livestock Production. 2018, 9(12), 326-333.
[14] Nalluri N, & Karri V. R. Grain legumes and their by-products: as a nutrient rich feed supplement in the sustainable intensification of commercial poultry industry. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews 51: Legume Agriculture and Biotechnology. 2021, Vol 2: 51-96.
[15] Manole M, Ciurescu G & Dumitru M. The use of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata [L] Walp) in poultry diets: A review. Archiva Zootechnica. 2024; 27(1): 23-47;
[16] Affrifah N. S, Phillips R. D & Saalia F. K. Cowpeas: Nutritional profile, processing methods and products—A review. Legume Science. 2022 Sep; 4(3): e131;
[17] Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Association of Official Agricultural Chemists (US). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.; 2000.
[18] Wiseman J. Feeding of non-ruminant animals. Meat, Nutritional Requirements, and Availability of Resources. London: Research Publications; 1987. p. 9-15.
[19] Honikel, K. O. Reference methods for the assessment of physical characteristics of meat. Meat science.1998, 49(4), 447- 457.
[20] Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Association of Official Chemists (US). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.; 2005.
[21] Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Association of Official Chemists (US). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists.; 2012.
[22] Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Association of Official Chemists (US). Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 1990. Inc.: Washington, DC, USA, Chapter 32.
[23] Chakam V. P., Teguia A,& Tchoumboue J. Performance of finisher broiler chickens as affected by different proportions of cooked cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata) in the grower-finisher diet. African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development. 2010; 10(4).
[24] Adino S., Wondifraw Z, & Addis M. Replacement of soybean grain with cowpea grain (Vigna unguiculata) as protein supplement in Sasso x Rir crossbred chick’s diet. Poultry, Fish and Wildlife Science. 2018; 6(1): 1-6.
[25] Eljack, B. H., Fadlalla, I. M. T., & Ibrahim, M. T. The effect of feeding cowpea (Vigna ungialata) on broiler chicks, performance and some carcass quality measurements. Assiut Veterinary Medical Journal. 2010, 56(124), 1-8.
[26] Biama, P. K. Nutritional, Technological and Sensory Characteristics of Improved Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata L.) Lines and Varieties Cultivated in Arid and Semi-Arid Lands of Eastern Kenya (Doctoral dissertation, Egerton University). 2021.
[27] Kulkarni, K. P., Tayade, R., Asekova, S., Song, J. T., Shannon, J. G., & Lee, J. D. Harnessing the potential of forage legumes, alfalfa, soybean, and cowpea for sustainable agriculture and global food security. Frontiers in plant science. 2018, 9, 1314.
[28] Daniel Afolabi, K., Milverton Eko, P., Linus Unah, U., & Matthew Mofatt, B. Growth Performance, Carcass Traits and Economy of Broiler Chickens Fed Straight Diets with Varying Dietary Protein Levels. Asian Journal of Research in Animal and Veterinary Sciences 2022, 10(3), 13-22.
[29] Nahm K. H., & Carlson C. W. The possible minimum chicken nutrient requirements for protecting the environment and improving cost efficiency- Review. Asian-Australasian Journal of Animal Sciences. 1998; 11(6): 755-68
[30] Ciurescu, G., Ropotă, M. & Vasilachi, A., Effect of dietary cowpea (Vigna unguiculata [L] walp) and chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) seeds on growth performance, blood parameters and breast meat fatty acids in broiler chickens. Italian Journal of Animal Science. 2022, 21(1), 97-105.
[31] Tshovhote, N. J., Gous, R. M. Nesamvuni, A. E. & Raphulu, T. The chemical composition, energy and amino acid digestibility of cowpeas used in poultry nutrition. South African Journal of Animal Science. 2003, 33(1), 65-69.
[32] Maidala, A., Mahmud, M., & Adamu, M. Carcass yield and gut characteristics of broiler chickens fed graded levels of cooked cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L Wolf). Nigerian Journal of Animal Production. 2017, 895-901.
[33] Carlson J. L., Erickson J. M., Lloyd B. B. & Slavin J. L. Health effects and sources of prebiotic dietary fiber. Current developments in nutrition. 2018 Mar 1; 2(3): nzy005.
[34] Guni, F. S., Mbaga, S. H., & Katule, A. M. (2021). Performance evaluation of Kuroiler and Sasso chicken breeds reared under on-farm and on-station management conditions in Tanzania. European Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 3(2), 53-59.
[35] Kejela, M., Diba, D., Duguma, G., Ferede, B., & Yusuf, H. Feed Intake, Weight Gain and Profitability of Sasso Chickens Fed Locally Formulated Rations at Wollega University, Nekemte, Ethiopia. World Applied Sciences Journal. 2020, 38(5), 404-415.
[36] Abrahamhemacha, S., & Lombebo, W. A. Growth performance, carcass yield and haematological response of broiler chickens fed on processed haricot bean (Phaseolus vulagris L.). Uttar pradesh journal of zoology. (2022), 43(1), 33-40.
[37] Asfaw, G., Diba, D., Yusuf, H., & Duguma, G. Performance Evaluation of Sasso Chickens that Fed on Rations formulated from Locally Available Feed Ingredients around Nekemte Area, Western Ethiopia. Ethiopian Journal of Agricultural Sciences. 2024, 34(1), 94-112.
[38] Zhou, L., Abouelezz, K., Baazaoui, N., Bajaber, M. A., Momenah, M. A., Saad, A. M. &Taha, T. F. Dietary Paenibacillus polymyxa AM20 as a new probiotic: Improving effects on IR broiler growth performance, hepatosomatic index, thyroid hormones, lipid profile, immune response, antioxidant parameters, and caecal microorganisms. Poultry Science. 2024, 103(2), 103239.
[39] Jaspal, M. H., Ali, S., Rajput, N., Naeem, M., Talpur, F. N., & Rehman, I. Fatty acid profiling and comparative evaluation of carcass cut up yield, meat quality traits of Cobb Sasso, commercial broiler and native aseel chicken. Pure and Applied Biology.2019. Vol. 9, Issue 1, pp56-65.
[40] Kiran, M., Naveena, B. M., Reddy, K. S., Reddy, K. K., & Rao, T. M. Effect of ammonium hydroxide on textural and ultrastructural properties of spent hen meat. International Food Research Journal.2014, 21(5), 2049.
[41] Kolobe S. D., Manyelo T. G, Ng’ambi J. W, Malematja E &Nemauluma M. F. Effect of Vachellia karroo leaf meal inclusion levels on growth, meat pH, shear force, cooking loss and shelf life of Ross 308 broiler chickens. Cogent Food & Agriculture. 2023 31; 9(1).
[42] Sujiwo J, Kim D, & Jang A. Relation among quality traits of chicken breast meat during cold storage: correlations between freshness traits and torrymeter values. Poultry science. 2018, 1; 97(8): 2887-94.
[43] Ndlovu N, Ndebele M. S., Usai T, Nyoka R, & Marume P. Physical attributes and nutritional composition of meat from dual purpose (Sasso C431 and TR51) broiler breeds in Ntabazinduna, Zimbabwe. International Journal on Food, Agriculture and Natural Resources. 2024 Sep 30; 5(3): 1-6;
[44] Kartikasari L, Hertanto B, & Nuhriawangsa A. Omega-3 profiles and chemical substances of chicken meat fed diets containing purslane (Portulaca oleraceae) meal rich in omega-3 fats. Food Research. 2023; 7(1): 35-41.
[45] Kim Y. H, Warner R. D, & Rosenvold K. Influence of high pre-rigor temperature and fast pH fall on muscle proteins and meat quality: a review. Animal Production Science. 2014 Mar 13; 54(4): 375-95.
[46] Mir N. A, Rafiq A, Kumar F, Singh V & Shukla V. Determinants of broiler chicken meat quality and factors affecting them: a review. Journal of food science and technology. 2017; 54: 2997-3009.
Cite This Article
  • APA Style

    Israel, M. E., Munubi, R. N., Chenyambuga, S. W. (2025). Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal with Cowpea Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Sasso Chickens. International Journal of Animal Science and Technology, 9(2), 61-73. https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15

    Copy | Download

    ACS Style

    Israel, M. E.; Munubi, R. N.; Chenyambuga, S. W. Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal with Cowpea Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Sasso Chickens. Int. J. Anim. Sci. Technol. 2025, 9(2), 61-73. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15

    Copy | Download

    AMA Style

    Israel ME, Munubi RN, Chenyambuga SW. Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal with Cowpea Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Sasso Chickens. Int J Anim Sci Technol. 2025;9(2):61-73. doi: 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15

    Copy | Download

  • @article{10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15,
      author = {Martha Emanuel Israel and Renalda Nanziga Munubi and Sebastian Wilson Chenyambuga},
      title = {Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal with Cowpea Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Sasso Chickens
    },
      journal = {International Journal of Animal Science and Technology},
      volume = {9},
      number = {2},
      pages = {61-73},
      doi = {10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15},
      url = {https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15},
      eprint = {https://article.sciencepublishinggroup.com/pdf/10.11648.j.ijast.20250902.15},
      abstract = {Soybean meal is a primary protein source in the poultry feed industry due to its high protein content and good amino acid profile. However, limited supply and high import costs in Tanzania make the cost of commercial feeds high. This study evaluated the effects of replacing soybean meal with cowpea meal on Sasso chickens' growth performance and meat characteristics. Five diets were formulated such that cowpea meal replaced soybean meal by 0 % (T1), 25 % (T2), 50 % (T3), 75 % (T4), and 100% (T5). A total of 150 one-month-old Sasso chickens with weights ranging from 603.33 ± 10.04 to 618.79 ± 15.30 g were randomly assigned to the five dietary treatments and reared for nine weeks. The amount of feed provided and the refusals were recorded daily and body weight was measured once per week. At the end of the experiment, feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. In addition, a total of 30 chickens, six chickens per treatment, were randomly selected and slaughtered to determine carcass characteristics. The chickens under T5 had higher (P ≤ 0.001) average feed intake (120.76 ± 1.43 g/d), final body weight (2624.56 ± 62 g), weight gain (1824.37 ± 42.43 g), daily weight gain (31.91 ± 0.90 g/d), slaughter body weight (2592.53 ± 133.73 g) and carcass weight (1988.80 ± 137.00 g) than those on the other treatments. The chickens on T1 had the lowest values for the same parameters. The FCR ranged from 3.77 ± 0.04 in T3 to 4.37 ± 0.06 in T2. However, the meat of the chickens in T1 had higher crude protein (21.59 ± 0.71 %) and lower fat contents (10.24 ± 1.19 %) than those in T5 (P ≤ 0.05) (18.59 ± 0.82 % CP and 16.60 ± 1.06 % fat). The study concludes that cowpea meal can completely replace soybean meal as an alternative plant protein source in poultry diets.
    },
     year = {2025}
    }
    

    Copy | Download

  • TY  - JOUR
    T1  - Effects of Replacing Soybean Meal with Cowpea Meal on Growth Performance and Carcass Characteristics of Sasso Chickens
    
    AU  - Martha Emanuel Israel
    AU  - Renalda Nanziga Munubi
    AU  - Sebastian Wilson Chenyambuga
    Y1  - 2025/04/29
    PY  - 2025
    N1  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15
    DO  - 10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15
    T2  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    JF  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    JO  - International Journal of Animal Science and Technology
    SP  - 61
    EP  - 73
    PB  - Science Publishing Group
    SN  - 2640-1312
    UR  - https://doi.org/10.11648/j.ijast.20250902.15
    AB  - Soybean meal is a primary protein source in the poultry feed industry due to its high protein content and good amino acid profile. However, limited supply and high import costs in Tanzania make the cost of commercial feeds high. This study evaluated the effects of replacing soybean meal with cowpea meal on Sasso chickens' growth performance and meat characteristics. Five diets were formulated such that cowpea meal replaced soybean meal by 0 % (T1), 25 % (T2), 50 % (T3), 75 % (T4), and 100% (T5). A total of 150 one-month-old Sasso chickens with weights ranging from 603.33 ± 10.04 to 618.79 ± 15.30 g were randomly assigned to the five dietary treatments and reared for nine weeks. The amount of feed provided and the refusals were recorded daily and body weight was measured once per week. At the end of the experiment, feed intake, weight gain and feed conversion ratio (FCR) were calculated. In addition, a total of 30 chickens, six chickens per treatment, were randomly selected and slaughtered to determine carcass characteristics. The chickens under T5 had higher (P ≤ 0.001) average feed intake (120.76 ± 1.43 g/d), final body weight (2624.56 ± 62 g), weight gain (1824.37 ± 42.43 g), daily weight gain (31.91 ± 0.90 g/d), slaughter body weight (2592.53 ± 133.73 g) and carcass weight (1988.80 ± 137.00 g) than those on the other treatments. The chickens on T1 had the lowest values for the same parameters. The FCR ranged from 3.77 ± 0.04 in T3 to 4.37 ± 0.06 in T2. However, the meat of the chickens in T1 had higher crude protein (21.59 ± 0.71 %) and lower fat contents (10.24 ± 1.19 %) than those in T5 (P ≤ 0.05) (18.59 ± 0.82 % CP and 16.60 ± 1.06 % fat). The study concludes that cowpea meal can completely replace soybean meal as an alternative plant protein source in poultry diets.
    
    VL  - 9
    IS  - 2
    ER  - 

    Copy | Download

Author Information
  • Sections